This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Private Equity, a collaborative effort to improve the depth of quality and coverage of the private equity and venture capital industry and related topics in Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
This project seeks to collaborate with the following WikiProjects:
I question whether this article maintains an appropriate encyclopedic tone. The discussion of its founding almost reads like a novel, by announcing the name of particular characters and things they were up to prior to founding LTCM. The strategy discussion again sounds more like the thesis of a non-fiction book trying to make a point about LTCM than an encyclopedia ("main strategy," "basically place a bet," etc.). Ditto for the "brightest star" line. The aside about how fixed income arbitrage works. The "disconcerting note," 17% being "actually right at the average," I could go on and on with examples, but from start to finish this reads more like an article in a magazine than an encyclopedia. MrArticleOne (talk) 23:16, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
